- 07 Jan, 2013 6 commits
-
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
I thought that explicit type name made the code more readable, but maybe that's not the case so I've removed it now. It still needs to be specified in the other constructor.
-
- 03 Jan, 2013 8 commits
-
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
Instead, make the one that returns ConstRRsetPtr virtual.
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
- 01 Jan, 2013 8 commits
-
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
the latter doesn't always work.
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
- 26 Dec, 2012 9 commits
-
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
This commit also changes the base class's find() prototype to include the RRClass as an argument. Otherwise, we don't know what RRClass to look for. The arguments for the base class's find() method are in a different order from those of the find() methods in the RRsetCollection implementation as there's no way to overload the method when only its return value is different.
-
- 24 Dec, 2012 3 commits
-
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
- 21 Dec, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
- 19 Dec, 2012 5 commits
-
-
Jelte Jansen authored
-
Jelte Jansen authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-