Skip to content
GitLab
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Help
Support
Community forum
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
BIND
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
583
Issues
583
List
Boards
Labels
Service Desk
Milestones
Merge Requests
112
Merge Requests
112
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Operations
Operations
Incidents
Environments
Packages & Registries
Packages & Registries
Container Registry
Analytics
Analytics
CI / CD
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
ISC Open Source Projects
BIND
Commits
0a135903
Commit
0a135903
authored
Sep 12, 2017
by
Mark Andrews
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
4715. [bug] TreeMemMax was mis-identified as a second HeapMemMax
in the Json cache statistics. [RT #45980]
parent
c75e9c76
Changes
2
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
with
4 additions
and
1 deletion
+4
-1
CHANGES
CHANGES
+3
-0
lib/dns/cache.c
lib/dns/cache.c
+1
-1
No files found.
CHANGES
View file @
0a135903
4715. [bug] TreeMemMax was mis-identified as a second HeapMemMax
in the Json cache statistics. [RT #45980]
4714. [port] openbsd/libressl: add support for building with
--enable-openssl-hash. [RT #45982]
...
...
lib/dns/cache.c
View file @
0a135903
...
...
@@ -1581,7 +1581,7 @@ dns_cache_renderjson(dns_cache_t *cache, json_object *cstats) {
obj
=
json_object_new_int64
(
isc_mem_maxinuse
(
cache
->
mctx
));
CHECKMEM
(
obj
);
json_object_object_add
(
cstats
,
"
Heap
MemMax"
,
obj
);
json_object_object_add
(
cstats
,
"
Tree
MemMax"
,
obj
);
obj
=
json_object_new_int64
(
isc_mem_total
(
cache
->
hmctx
));
CHECKMEM
(
obj
);
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment