Skip to content

GitLab

  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
  • BIND BIND
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Planning hierarchy
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 524
    • Issues 524
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 105
    • Merge requests 105
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Container Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • ISC Open Source Projects
  • BINDBIND
  • Issues
  • #1405

Closed
Open
Created Nov 26, 2019 by Francis Dupont@fdupontDeveloper

Additional RRs for ILNP RR queries.

RFC 6742 has some requirements like this one:

To improve performance, ILNP-aware DNS servers and DNS resolvers MAY attempt to return all L32, L64, and LP records for the same owner name of the NID RRset in the Additional section of the response, if space permits.

(in fact one per new RR)

bind implements the ILNP MRs but not these "Additional Section Processing" requirements.

BTW if it is enough to put some code into additionaldata_xxx() functions in function in the corresponding lib/dns/rdata/generic/foo_yyy.c files I can provide the patch in a MR.

Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking