- 08 Feb, 2012 2 commits
-
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
- 07 Feb, 2012 1 commit
-
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
- 03 Feb, 2012 3 commits
-
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
Stephen Morris authored
-
Stephen Morris authored
Conflicts: src/lib/datasrc/memory_datasrc.cc
-
- 02 Feb, 2012 7 commits
-
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
Stephen Morris authored
addRRsig does not change its arguments, so there is no reason why they cannont be declared "const Xxxx&", thereby saving the overhead of a copy when the method is called.
-
Stephen Morris authored
... instead of throwing an exception.
-
Jeremy C. Reed authored
-
Jeremy C. Reed authored
notice by outside person
-
- 01 Feb, 2012 12 commits
-
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
CNAME + non-NSEC is about to coexist.
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
cases.
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
NXRRSET (including empty) for any-query was already supported and tested.
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
to add in the main code for them, just confirming it also works for these cases.
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
case.
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
- 31 Jan, 2012 15 commits
-
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
to test expected list of RRsets. This should be generally better as explained for the same update to findTest().
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
this makes the test code shorter, and perfomrs more flexible than pointer comparison. this is not necessarily crucial for this branch, but will eventually be necessary when we update the internal representation of in-memory data. at that point returned RRset by find() will be different from the one installed by add() wrt pointer comprison.
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
in contextCheck. passing reference to a shared pointer doesn't make sense (and IMO could be rather confusing for a quite little benefit) when we often dereference it in the function anyway. in this case we can simply use a normal reference as the ownership isn't transferred.
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
g++ somehow seems to require it to compile with toupper. updated comments about it.
-