- 23 Oct, 2012 10 commits
-
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
with fixing Conflicts to: src/bin/auth/auth_srv.cc src/bin/auth/auth_srv.h src/bin/auth/datasrc_clients_mgr.h src/bin/auth/main.cc src/bin/auth/tests/auth_srv_unittest.cc src/bin/auth/tests/command_unittest.cc
-
Jelte Jansen authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
update the test case and log message accordingly.
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
the users of this method only need the set behavior, and the previous code actually didn't swap them as expected anyway.
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
Jelte Jansen authored
-
Marcin Siodelski authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
This reverts commit e6ba20b0, reversing changes made to c9ba8373.
-
- 22 Oct, 2012 11 commits
-
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
JINMEI Tatuya authored
-
Michal 'vorner' Vaner authored
This reverts commit 81239246. This should have gone to a branch, not to master. Reverting it until it gets reviewed properly.
-
Michal 'vorner' Vaner authored
Unlike what the ticket suggests, it takes concrete origin parameter, not some yet unknown config value, for two reasons: * The format of config is not known. * Leaking some details about what memory segment or whatever is being used for the cache through the interface looks like a bad idea. Even leaking the existence of the cache is enough.
-
Jelte Jansen authored
-
Jelte Jansen authored
as discussed in the ticket comments
-
Marcin Siodelski authored
-
Marcin Siodelski authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
This is necessary because run_dbutil.sh sometimes loses its execute (+x) mode bit when regenerated, and tests fail due to it.
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
- 21 Oct, 2012 19 commits
-
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
tryLock() is necessary inside InterprocessSyncFile. It also doesn't make sense afterwards to make a dynamically constructed Mutex::Locker that lives after the basic block is exited. So lock() and unlock() have also been made public. I've added comments to discourage the use of these methods directly and use the Mutex::Locker where applicable.
-
Mukund Sivaraman authored
This test fails now because there's no mutual exclusion among threads in the implementation.
-