Commit 43fae7e8 authored by Michal 'vorner' Vaner's avatar Michal 'vorner' Vaner
Browse files

[2726] Explicitly call the default constructor

This is no difference in the code, as the default constructor would be
called implicitly, but cppcheck warned about not calling one.
parent 00734150
......@@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ public:
rrclass_(RRClass::IN()),
// The empty list corresponds to a list with no elements inside
list_(new TestedList(rrclass_)),
negative_result_(),
config_elem_(Element::fromJSON("["
"{"
" \"type\": \"test_type\","
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment