Commit b4ecbba0 authored by Tomek Mrugalski's avatar Tomek Mrugalski 🛰
Browse files

[3795] One extra unit-test implemented for pkt6-receive-drop

parent ad36b40c
......@@ -373,7 +373,8 @@ TEST_F(SARRTest, pkt6ReceiveDropStat1) {
}
// This test verifies that pkt6-receive-drop is increased properly when the
// client's packet is rejected due to sending to unicast.
// client's packet is rejected due to having too many client-id options
// (exactly one is expected).
TEST_F(SARRTest, pkt6ReceiveDropStat2) {
// Let's use one of the existing configurations and tell the client to
......@@ -396,5 +397,34 @@ TEST_F(SARRTest, pkt6ReceiveDropStat2) {
EXPECT_EQ(1, pkt6_recv_drop->getInteger().first);
}
// This test verifies that pkt6-receive-drop is increased properly when the
// client's packet is rejected due to having too many
TEST_F(SARRTest, pkt6ReceiveDropStat3) {
// Let's use one of the existing configurations and tell the client to
// ask for an address.
Dhcp6Client client;
configure(CONFIGS[1], *client.getServer());
client.setInterface("eth1");
client.useNA();
client.setDestAddress(asiolink::IOAddress("2001:db8::1")); // Pretend it's unicast
// Let's send our client-id as server-id. That will result in the
// packet containing the client-id twice. That should cause RFCViolation
// exception.
client.useServerId(client.getClientId());
client.doSolicit();
// Ok, let's check the statistics. None should be present.
using namespace isc::stats;
StatsMgr& mgr = StatsMgr::instance();
ObservationPtr pkt6_recv_drop = mgr.getObservation("pkt6-receive-drop");
ASSERT_TRUE(pkt6_recv_drop);
EXPECT_EQ(1, pkt6_recv_drop->getInteger().first);
}
} // end of anonymous namespace
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment