Commit ef64723f authored by JINMEI Tatuya's avatar JINMEI Tatuya
Browse files

[master] clarified the expected behavior of DatabaseAccessor::getNext()

after it returns false.
okayed on jabber, and I don't think we need a separate ticket/branch for
this as it's just a small documentation update.
parent 5de6f965
......@@ -137,6 +137,11 @@ public:
* definition already known to the caller (it already passes it as
* an argument to getRecords()).
*
* Once this function returns false, any subsequent call to it should
* result in false. The implementation of a derived class must ensure
* it doesn't cause any disruption due to that such as a crash or
* exception.
*
* \note The order of RRs is not strictly set, but the RRs for single
* RRset must not be interleaved with any other RRs (eg. RRsets must be
* "together").
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment