1. 11 Feb, 2013 1 commit
  2. 23 Jan, 2013 1 commit
  3. 22 Jan, 2013 1 commit
  4. 10 Jan, 2013 1 commit
  5. 12 Dec, 2012 1 commit
  6. 10 Dec, 2012 3 commits
  7. 11 Oct, 2012 3 commits
  8. 08 Oct, 2012 1 commit
  9. 02 Oct, 2012 2 commits
  10. 30 Sep, 2012 2 commits
  11. 07 Sep, 2012 1 commit
  12. 28 Aug, 2012 1 commit
    • Michal 'vorner' Vaner's avatar
      [2180] Make the SQLITE_SETUP message a warning · fcde1f32
      Michal 'vorner' Vaner authored
      Since creating new file is suspicious, the administrator may have
      misspelled some file name. The message explains the problem and shows
      the file name as well.
      
      Also, removed a duplicate message, created a new instance for it.
      fcde1f32
  13. 18 Apr, 2012 6 commits
  14. 17 Apr, 2012 3 commits
  15. 16 Apr, 2012 1 commit
  16. 14 Apr, 2012 1 commit
  17. 13 Apr, 2012 2 commits
    • JINMEI Tatuya's avatar
      [1781] introduced addRecordToNSEC3Zone interface to DB accessors. · 0bc5c68e
      JINMEI Tatuya authored
      this is the first step to support updating the NSEC3 namespace of a zone.
      to help support various cases in addRRset() in a less expensive way,
      introduced a helper RRParameterConverter class.
      one simple test case was added to confirm the behavior.
      0bc5c68e
    • Michal 'vorner' Vaner's avatar
      [1782] Include the NSEC3 namespace in the iterator · 3057455d
      Michal 'vorner' Vaner authored
      It is included using the UNION SQL statement to concatenate the tables
      together. The ordering is little bit of a hack. We could order by name,
      but that would not be much better and a lot of tests would need to be
      modified. Also, the NSEC3 sigtype is hardcoded for the NSEC3 namespace,
      as there can be no other signature.
      3057455d
  18. 03 Apr, 2012 1 commit
    • JINMEI Tatuya's avatar
      [1746] removed SQLite3Accessor::getRecordDiff, and adjusted the test as such. · 69e76e0e
      JINMEI Tatuya authored
      it was intended to be a short term hack until we implement getDiffs(),
      but apparently we forgot to complete the cleanup task.  So this is just an
      originally planned cleanup.
      note that there was a bug in the test code.  The change to diff_add_a_data
      is not to hide a problem in the tested code, but it's a fix to the test's bug.
      69e76e0e
  19. 02 Apr, 2012 2 commits
  20. 30 Mar, 2012 2 commits
  21. 19 Mar, 2012 3 commits
  22. 16 Mar, 2012 1 commit