Skip to content

Use memory_order_acq_rel in isc_refcount_decrement.

Mark Andrews requested to merge 2096-isc_refcount_decrement-needs-acquire-release-memory-ordering-v9_11 into v9_11

While

if (isc_refcount_decrement() == 1) {	// memory_order_release
	isc_refcount_destroy();		// memory_order_acquire
	...
}

is theoretically the most efficent in practice, using memory_order_acq_rel produces the same code on x86_64 and doesn't trigger tsan data races (which use a idealistic model) if isc_refcount_destroy() is not called immediately. In fact isc_refcount_destroy() could be removed if we didn't want to check for the count being 0 when isc_refcount_destroy() is called.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49112732/memory-order-in-shared-pointer-destructor (cherry picked from commit 6278899a)

Closes #2096 (closed)

Edited by Mark Andrews

Merge request reports